Why do great empires fall




















The Persians, having conquered a great empire, want to move from their harsh mountains to a richer land — but Cyrus, their king, forbids it. Implicit in his narrative, written at a time when Athens was at her peak of glory, is a warning: where other great powers have gone, the Athenians will surely follow. The Romans signalled their arrival on the international stage by fighting three terrible wars with a rival west Mediterranean people: the Carthaginians.

At the end of the third war, in BC, they succeeded in capturing Carthage, and levelling it to the ground. Nevertheless, it is said of the Roman general who torched Carthage that he wept as he watched her burn and quoted lines from Homer on the fall of Troy.

Then he turned to a Greek companion. There were many, as the Romans continued to expand their rule across the Mediterranean, who found themselves hoping that the presentiment was an accurate one. Rome was a brutal and domineering mistress, and the increasing number of much older civilisations under her sway unsurprisingly felt much resentment of her autocratic ways. Rome and her empire were engulfed by civil war. In one particular bloody campaign, it has been estimated, a quarter of all citizens of military age were fighting on one side or the other.

No wonder that, amid such slaughter, even the Romans dared to contemplate the end of their empire. But the Roman state did not die.

In the event, the decades of civil war were brought to an end, and a new and universal era of peace was proclaimed. Virgil, perhaps because he had gazed into the abyss of civil war and understood what anarchy meant, proved a worthy laureate of the new age. All the world has been adorned by you as a pleasure garden. In the event, the garden would turn to brambles and weeds. Intruders would smash down the fences. New tenants would carve up much of it between themselves.

Yet the dream of Rome did not fade. Its potency was too strong for that. He was not the first barbarian to find in the memory of Rome — the splendour of its monuments, the vastness of its sway, the sheer conceit of its pretensions — the only conceivable model for an upwardly mobile king to ape. Indeed, one could say that the whole history of the early-medieval west is understood best as a series of attempts by various warlords to square the grandeur of their Roman ambitions with the paucity of their resources.

There was Charlemagne, who not only had himself crowned as emperor in Rome on Christmas Day AD, but plundered the city of pillars for his own capital back in Aachen. Then there was Otto I, the great warrior king of the Saxons, a hairy-chested lion of a man, who in was also crowned in Rome.

The line of emperors that he founded did not expire until , when the Holy Roman empire, as it had first become known in the 13th century, was terminated by Napoleon. Yet the joke was not quite fair. There had been a time when it was all three. There are several reasons for the decline and fall of Empires and Dinasties but some of the most common are the concentration of wealth and power in the handd of just a few members of the population, the impossibility to afford an army, wrong decisions as regards policies of the government and mass poverty.

According to the U. Sun, Amarjeet was just seven years old when he began feeding his bloodlust. His first kill was a baby. By the time he had turned eight, he had taken three lives. The young girl had been stabbed 17 times by her brother, Paris Bennett, who was just 13 at the time. Paris picked up the knife and attacked his half-sister as she slept in her bed, after convincing their babysitter to go home. The book struck a nerve at a time when the United States was mired in two unending wars, beset by growing inequality, and on the verge of economic collapse.

What did you think of the premise? I agree with it percent. The date for the Western Empire is always given as A. It was a slow, lumbering, messy deterioration. When you look at what is happening to the United States right now you see something very similar. I remember once asking a great scholar of Rome, Ramsay MacMullen, if he could sum up the history of the Roman Empire in a very limited number of words. I thought you might argue that he was like a Visigoth or a Vandal.

Take Alaric. But he came from a part of the empire that had once been Roman. He spoke Latin, as well as his own language. He was given positions of responsibility in the Roman military. He was well connected with imperial institutions. In many ways what they wanted more than anything was to be part of the ongoing good thing that they saw the Empire as being.

Have you caught yourself thinking of different analogs as the Trump administration has gone on? I do find myself thinking of America and Rome repeatedly and wondering whether, if I were to write the book now, I would write it differently. I think I would not, because the issues that the book brought up were not really tied to the deeds or misdeeds of any one president or party; they were things that were built into the very nature of the way our country is built and is positioned in the world.

Those are things like the vast military overextension around the world, or the hollowing out of public institutions. You see examples of that occurring all the time—Robert Kraft sending a plane to China to bring back medical supplies to be used in Massachusetts.

But this is just a classic example of relying on the ad hoc generosity of the private sector to do something that the government ought to be doing anyway. Read More Depending on the time, place, and identity of the observer, this process could look and feel much different.

If you survived to age 60, that market town would no longer exist, along with every other urban settlement of any significant size. You lived in a small village now instead of a genuine town.

You had grown up using money, but now you bartered—grain for metalwork, beer for pottery, hides for fodder. You no longer saw the once-ubiquitous Roman army or the battalions of officials who administered the Roman state. That year-old woman had been born into a place as fundamentally Roman as anywhere in the empire.

She died in a place that was barely recognizable. Imagine you were lucky enough to have been born the son of an aristocrat in Provence around the year If you survived to the age of 60, your life at the end would not seem drastically different from what it was at the beginning. Other than that, your life was pretty much the same.

You still had your fancy villa with its bathhouse and library and comfortable furniture. You still wrote letters to your aristocratic friends and relatives in an educated Latin style so tortured that it was more of a status-signaling device than a means of communication. You still played politics in the nearest city, which was mostly as it was at the time of your birth: fewer people maybe, a local bishop with more influence, the buildings a bit more run down, but still recognizable.

As the gulf widened, the largely Greek-speaking Eastern Empire grew in wealth while the Latin-speaking West descended into economic crisis. Most importantly, the strength of the Eastern Empire served to divert Barbarian invasions to the West.

Emperors like Constantine ensured that the city of Constantinople was fortified and well guarded, but Italy and the city of Rome—which only had symbolic value for many in the East—were left vulnerable. The Western political structure would finally disintegrate in the fifth century, but the Eastern Empire endured in some form for another thousand years before being overwhelmed by the Ottoman Empire in the s.

At its height, the Roman Empire stretched from the Atlantic Ocean all the way to the Euphrates River in the Middle East, but its grandeur may have also been its downfall. With such a vast territory to govern, the empire faced an administrative and logistical nightmare. Even with their excellent road systems, the Romans were unable to communicate quickly or effectively enough to manage their holdings.

Rome struggled to marshal enough troops and resources to defend its frontiers from local rebellions and outside attacks, and by the second century the Emperor Hadrian was forced to build his famous wall in Britain just to keep the enemy at bay.

Being the Roman emperor had always been a particularly dangerous job, but during the tumultuous second and third centuries it nearly became a death sentence. Civil war thrust the empire into chaos, and more than 20 men took the throne in the span of only 75 years, usually after the murder of their predecessor. The political rot also extended to the Roman Senate, which failed to temper the excesses of the emperors due to its own widespread corruption and incompetence. As the situation worsened, civic pride waned and many Roman citizens lost trust in their leadership.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000